BLOG

Indian Electoral System: Election Commision of India

This is a detailed examination of the electoral system in India, covering the constitutional framework, the role of the Election Commission, key legislation like the Representation of the People Acts, and ongoing debates surrounding electoral reforms.

Part 1: Constitutional Framework and the Election Commission

A. Elections: Constitutional Foundation

The Indian Constitution lays down the fundamental principles for conducting elections in the country.

1. Power to Legislate (Article 327 & 328):

  • Parliament (Article 327): The Constitution grants Parliament the authority to make laws concerning all matters related to elections for Parliament and State Legislatures. This includes the preparation of electoral rolls, delimitation of constituencies, and other necessary provisions.
  • State Legislatures (Article 328): State Legislatures can also make laws on electoral matters for their respective states, but only in areas where Parliament has not already legislated.

2. Core Principles of Indian Elections: This legislative power is subject to two foundational principles enshrined in the Constitution:

  • No Separate Electorates (Article 325): The Constitution explicitly prohibits separate electorates based on religion, race, caste, or sex. This ensures a common electoral roll for all eligible citizens.
  • Universal Adult Suffrage (Article 326): Elections to the Lok Sabha and State Legislative Assemblies must be conducted on the basis of adult suffrage. Every citizen of India who is 18 years of age or older is entitled to be registered as a voter, provided they are not disqualified on grounds of non-residence, unsoundness of mind, crime, or corrupt practices.
    • Note: The voting age was lowered from 21 to 18 by the 61st Constitutional Amendment Act, 1988.

3. The Right to Vote:

  • According to the Supreme Court, the Right to Vote is a statutory right, not a fundamental or constitutional right. It is granted and regulated by the Representation of the People Act, 1951.

B. The Election Commission of India (ECI)

The ECI is the autonomous constitutional authority responsible for administering election processes in India.

1. Constitutional Mandate (Article 324):

  • Article 324 vests the superintendence, direction, and control of all elections to Parliament, State Legislatures, and the offices of the President and Vice-President in the Election Commission.

2. Structure and Composition:

  • The ECI consists of the Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) and other Election Commissioners (ECs), with the number of ECs determined by the President.
  • Evolution:
    • Until 1989: Single-member body.
    • 1989: Became a multi-member body with the addition of two ECs.
    • 1990: Reverted to a single-member body.
    • Since 1993: It has been a multi-member body, with the CEC acting as the chairman. Decisions are made by consensus or majority vote.
  • The Chief Election Commissioner and Other Election Commissioners (Conditions of Service) Act, 1991 (amended in 1993) equates the status, salary, and decision-making power of the CEC and the ECs.

3. Appointment and Removal:

  • The President appoints the CEC and ECs.
  • Removal of CEC: The Chief Election Commissioner can only be removed from office in the same manner and on the same grounds as a Judge of the Supreme Court.
  • Removal of ECs: Other Election Commissioners or Regional Commissioners can only be removed on the recommendation of the CEC.

4. Key Functions of the ECI:

  • Electoral Roll Preparation: Preparing and maintaining accurate electoral rolls.
  • Conduct of Elections: Overseeing the entire process of conducting free and fair elections.
  • Advisory Role: Advising the President and Governors on matters related to the disqualification of legislators.
  • Model Code of Conduct (MCC): Preparing and enforcing the MCC to ensure a level playing field for all parties and candidates.
  • Election Expenses: Fixing and examining the limits of election expenses for candidates.
  • Recognition of Political Parties: Granting recognition to national and state parties and allotting election symbols.
  • Dispute Adjudication: Settling disputes related to election symbols.
  • Plenary Powers: As affirmed by the Supreme Court in Gill vs. CEC (1977), the ECI has comprehensive powers to take necessary actions to ensure free and fair elections, even if not explicitly mentioned in the law.

Part 2: Representation of the People Act (RPA), 1950

The RPA, 1950, primarily deals with the preparation and maintenance of electoral rolls and the allocation of seats.

Key Provisions:

  1. Electoral Officers: Establishes the roles of the Chief Electoral Officer (CEO) at the state level and the District Election Officer (DEO) at the district level to supervise the preparation of electoral rolls.
  2. Electoral Rolls: Mandates the creation of an electoral roll for every constituency.
  3. Disqualifications for Registration (Section 16): A person is disqualified from being registered as a voter if they:
    • Are not a citizen of India.
    • Are of unsound mind as declared by a court.
    • Are disqualified from voting due to corrupt practices or other election-related offenses.
  4. Conditions for Registration (Section 19): To be registered, a person must:
    • Be at least 18 years old on the qualifying date.
    • Be “ordinarily resident” in the constituency.
  5. Provisions for NRI Voters (Section 20A): Allows Indian citizens residing abroad for employment or education to register in the constituency mentioned in their passport. They must vote in person.
  6. Service Voters: Members of the Armed Forces, certain armed police forces, and government employees serving outside India can vote through postal ballot or proxy.

Part 3: Representation of the People Act (RPA), 1951

The RPA, 1951, provides the detailed legal framework for the conduct of elections.

1. Qualifications and Disqualifications for Membership:

  • Qualifications (Sections 3, 4, 5): A candidate must be an elector for a parliamentary constituency in India (for Lok Sabha/Rajya Sabha) or an assembly constituency in the state (for State Assembly/Council).
  • Disqualifications (Sections 8-10A): A person can be disqualified on various grounds:
    • Conviction for Certain Offences (Section 8): Disqualification for conviction of offenses like promoting enmity, bribery, rape, and offenses under acts like the Protection of Civil Rights Act, Prevention of Corruption Act, etc. The disqualification period is generally six years after release from imprisonment.
      • Lily Thomas Case (2013): The Supreme Court struck down Section 8(4), which allowed convicted legislators to continue in office if they filed an appeal within three months. Now, disqualification is immediate upon conviction.
    • Corrupt Practices (Section 8A): Disqualification for up to six years if found guilty of corrupt practices.
    • Dismissal for Corruption or Disloyalty (Section 9): Disqualification for five years.
    • Government Contracts (Section 9A): Disqualification for having subsisting government contracts.
    • Failure to Lodge Election Expenses (Section 10A): Disqualification for three years if an account of election expenses is not filed without a valid reason.

2. Conduct of Elections:

  • Right to Information (Section 33A): Candidates must furnish information regarding pending criminal cases, convictions, assets, liabilities, and educational qualifications. Supreme Court judgments have expanded these disclosure requirements to include the source of income for the candidate and their family.
  • Election Officials: Defines the roles and general duties of Returning Officers, Presiding Officers, and Polling Officers, who are deemed to be on deputation to the ECI during the election period.
  • Polling Process: Includes provisions for fixing polling time, ordering a fresh poll in case of EVM destruction or booth capturing, and ensuring the secrecy of voting.
  • Right to Vote (Section 62): Confirms that every person on the electoral roll is entitled to vote but prohibits voting if a person is in prison (except for preventive detention).
  • Election Petitions (Sections 80 & 80A): Any election can be challenged only through an election petition presented to the High Court. Appeals can be made to the Supreme Court.

3. Corrupt Practices and Electoral Offences:

  • Corrupt Practices (Section 123): This is a critical section that defines corrupt practices, including:
    • Bribery.
    • Undue influence.
    • Appealing to voters on grounds of religion, race, caste, community, or language.
    • Promoting feelings of enmity or hatred.
    • Publication of false statements about a candidate.
    • Obtaining assistance from government servants.
  • Electoral Offences (Sections 125-135C): These are punishable offenses, including:
    • Promoting enmity between classes.
    • Holding public meetings during the 48-hour period before the conclusion of the poll.
    • Disturbances at election meetings.
    • Canvassing within 100 meters of a polling station.
    • Booth capturing.
    • Distributing liquor during the 48-hour pre-poll period.

Part 4: Key Issues and Debates in Electoral Reforms

A. Criminalization of Politics

  • The Issue: The increasing presence and influence of individuals with criminal backgrounds in the political process.
  • Vohra Committee (1993): Acknowledged the deep-rooted nexus between criminals and politicians.
  • Supreme Court Interventions:
    • 2014: Directed that trials involving sitting legislators be completed within one year.
    • 2017: Ordered the setting up of special courts to fast-track cases against politicians.
    • 2018 (Public Interest Foundation Case): Mandated that candidates and political parties must publicize criminal antecedents in newspapers and on their websites.
  • Proposed Reforms: Disqualifying candidates against whom charges have been framed for heinous crimes (recommended by ECI).

B. Aberrations in the Electoral System

  • First-Past-the-Post (FPTP) System:
    • Advantages: Simple, provides a clear link between a representative and their constituency, and tends to produce stable governments.
    • Disadvantages: A candidate can win with a minority of votes, leading to a “wastage” of other votes and potentially unrepresentative outcomes.
  • Proportional Representation:
    • Advantages: Legislative strength is proportional to electoral strength.
    • Disadvantages: Can lead to fragmented politics, unstable coalition governments, and a weak link between legislators and constituencies.
  • Right to Reject (NOTA): While the NOTA (None of the Above) option exists on EVMs, it is a neutral vote and does not lead to the nullification of an election, unlike a true “negative vote” system.
  • Right to Recall: A proposal to allow voters to unseat an elected representative before their term ends. It is not implemented in India due to practical difficulties, potential for instability, and the risk of misuse.

C. Other Major Issues

  • Simultaneous Polls (“One Nation, One Election”):
    • Arguments For: Reduces costs, minimizes the disruption caused by the Model Code of Conduct, and allows governments to focus on governance.
    • Arguments Against: May subsume state-level issues under national narratives, undermines federalism, reduces government accountability, and presents significant logistical and constitutional challenges.
  • Opinion and Exit Polls:
    • Regulation: Section 126 of the RPA, 1951, prohibits displaying any election matter on electronic media during the 48 hours before the poll concludes. Section 126A bans the publication of exit poll results until the final phase of polling is over.
  • Model Code of Conduct (MCC):
    • A set of guidelines agreed upon by political parties to ensure ethical and fair conduct during elections. It comes into force from the date of the election announcement. While it is not legally enforceable, the ECI enforces it strictly, and its provisions often overlap with existing laws.

Part 5: Electoral Finance and Recent Reforms

A. Electoral Finance

  • The Problem: The increasing role of money power in elections, which creates an uneven playing field and fosters corruption.
  • Expenditure Limits: While there are limits on candidate expenditure, there are no limits on party expenditure.
  • Corporate Donations: The cap on corporate donations (previously 7.5% of average net profit) was removed in 2017, and companies are no longer required to disclose the names of the parties they donate to.
  • Electoral Bonds (Introduced in 2017):
    • An interest-free financial instrument that allows for anonymous donations to political parties.
    • Issues: Critics argue that it promotes opacity, favors the ruling party, and allows for quid pro quo arrangements between corporations and the government.
  • State Funding of Elections: A long-debated proposal for the government to fund election expenses to curb the use of black money. Various committees have recommended partial state funding in-kind, but it has not been implemented due to concerns about its feasibility and effectiveness.

B. The Election Laws (Amendment) Act, 2021

  • Key Amendments:
    • Multiple Qualifying Dates: Allows for four qualifying dates (Jan 1, Apr 1, Jul 1, Oct 1) for voter registration, instead of just one (Jan 1).
    • Gender Neutrality: Replaces the word “wife” with “spouse” in provisions for service voters.
    • Aadhaar-Voter ID Linkage: Permits electoral registration officers to require a person’s Aadhaar number to establish their identity for registration or authentication of existing entries.
      • Controversy: This has raised significant concerns about privacy, data security, and the potential for mass disenfranchisement, as Aadhaar is proof of residence, not citizenship.

Part 6: Voting Behavior and Political Dynamics

A. Determinants of Voting Behavior

The choice of a voter is influenced by a combination of long-term loyalties and short-term factors specific to an election.

  • Long-Term Factors (Social & Political Identity):
    • Caste and Religion: Remain powerful determinants, especially in rural areas. Political mobilization along caste (e.g., OBCs, Dalits) and religious lines is a significant feature.
    • Party Identification: Psychological attachment or loyalty to a specific political party, often influenced by family background and political socialization.
    • Socio-Economic Status: Voters from different economic strata often have different priorities. Poorer sections may be more concerned with personal economic issues and welfare schemes, while middle and upper classes may focus on broader societal problems and governance.
  • Short-Term Factors (Election Specific):
    • State of the Economy: Immediate economic conditions like inflation and unemployment heavily influence voter decisions.
    • Candidate and Leader Image: The public standing and personality of party leaders and local candidates play a crucial role.
    • Media Coverage: The pattern of media coverage shapes the public discourse and perception of issues and candidates.

B. Paradoxes in Indian Democracy

Indian democracy is characterized by several contradictions that exist simultaneously.

  • Participation vs. Quality: While voter turnout has steadily increased, signifying high participation, the influence of money and muscle power remains a persistent challenge to the quality of elections.
  • Identity Politics: Democratic politics, ideally issue-based, often revolves around identities like caste, religion, and language. While this gives voice to various social groups, an excessive focus can freeze these identities and hinder negotiation and reconciliation.
  • Democracy and Poverty: Despite a vibrant democracy with regular elections, abject poverty continues to exist. The political system has been more successful in addressing issues of social inequality (e.g., through reservations) than in achieving widespread economic upliftment.

Part 7: The Party System and Electoral Integrity

A. Recognition of National and State Parties

The ECI grants recognition to political parties based on their performance in elections, which comes with certain benefits.

  • Criteria for a State Party: A party must satisfy any of the following conditions:
    • Secure 6% of valid votes polled in the state assembly election and win at least 2 seats.
    • Secure 6% of valid votes polled in the state in a Lok Sabha election and win at least 1 seat.
    • Win 3% of the total seats in the legislative assembly, or 3 seats, whichever is more.
  • Criteria for a National Party: A party must satisfy any of the following conditions:
    • Be recognized as a State Party in at least four states.
    • Secure 6% of valid votes polled in any four or more states in a Lok Sabha or assembly election and win at least 4 Lok Sabha seats.
    • Win at least 2% of the total seats in the Lok Sabha from not less than three states.
  • Benefits of Recognition: Includes a reserved party symbol, free supply of electoral rolls, and free airtime on state-owned media during elections.

B. Trustworthiness of the Electoral Process (EVMs & VVPATs)

Maintaining public trust in the electoral machinery is crucial for democracy.

  • Electronic Voting Machines (EVMs): First used in 1982 and nationwide since the 2004 Lok Sabha election, EVMs have made the voting and counting process faster and more efficient. However, questions about their security and potential for tampering are periodically raised.
  • Voter Verifiable Paper Audit Trail (VVPAT): Introduced to enhance transparency, VVPAT is a system that produces a paper slip of the vote cast, which is visible to the voter for a few seconds before being stored. This paper trail can be used to verify the electronic count from the EVM. The Supreme Court has mandated the tallying of VVPAT slips from 5 randomly selected polling stations per assembly segment to rule out discrepancies.

Part 8: Timeline and Committees on Electoral Reform

Electoral reforms have been a continuous process in India, driven by recommendations from various committees and commissions.

  • Tarkunde Committee (1974):
    • Recommended fixing the ECI’s strength at three members.
    • Proposed a committee-based appointment process for the ECI, involving the Prime Minister, the Leader of the Opposition, and the Chief Justice of India.
    • Advocated for lowering the voting age to 18.
  • Key Reforms of the Late 1980s:
    • 1988: The 61st Amendment Act lowered the voting age to 18. The RPA was amended to provide for countermanding elections in cases of large-scale booth capturing.
    • 1989: A provision was added to the RPA, 1951, stipulating that all officials assigned to election duties would be considered on deputation to the ECI.
  • Dinesh Goswami Committee (1990):
    • Recommended issuing voter ID cards.
    • Proposed a ban on the transfer of officials involved in election work.
    • Suggested an increase in the security deposit for candidates.
  • Major Amendments of 1996:
    • The rules for countermanding an election upon the death of a candidate were changed to prevent unnecessary postponements.
    • A six-month time limit for holding by-elections was mandated.
    • A provision for a paid holiday for employees on polling day was introduced.
  • Law Commission 255th Report (2015): This comprehensive report made several key recommendations:
    • Regulation of Political Parties: Called for a separate chapter in the RPA to regulate the internal democratic functioning of political parties.
    • Strengthening ECI’s Independence: Proposed an independent secretariat for the ECI and recommended that its expenditure be ‘charged’ on the Consolidated Fund of India.
    • Anti-Defection Law: Suggested that the power to disqualify under the Tenth Schedule should be vested in the President/Governor, acting on the binding advice of the ECI.
    • Election Petitions: Recommended that election petitions be decided within six months.

Part 9: Modern Challenges to Electoral Integrity

A. Social Media and Democracy

The rise of social media has fundamentally altered the landscape of political campaigning.

  • Benefits: It has made the political process more inclusive, allowed for a greater diversity of viewpoints, and facilitated public engagement on an unprecedented scale.
  • Issues: The platform has also weakened ethical constraints on public discourse, enabling a combative and personal style of politics. It has become a breeding ground for hate speech, misinformation, and fake news.
  • Security Implications: Social media narratives can influence international relations and have the potential to spark communal violence, posing a threat to social stability and national security.

B. Compulsory Voting

The idea of making voting mandatory is periodically debated in India.

  • Arguments For: Proponents argue it would increase voter turnout, enhance the legitimacy of elected governments, and make the electorate more politically aware.
  • Arguments Against: Critics contend that democracy and coercion are incompatible. Enforcing it would be a logistical nightmare, and it might lead to “donkey voting,” where people vote without due consideration. Furthermore, the right to vote also implies the right not to vote. The ECI itself has favored voter education programs like SVEEP (Systematic Voters’ Education and Electoral Participation) over coercion.

C. Government-Sponsored Advertisements

The use of public funds for government advertising, especially in the run-up to elections, is a contentious issue.

  • Issues: Such advertisements can glorify the party in power, create a personality cult around leaders, and represent a wastage of public money for partisan interests, thereby distorting the level playing field.
  • Common Cause Judgment (2015): The Supreme Court laid down guidelines to prevent the misuse of government ads, suggesting they should not feature pictures of political leaders except for the President, Prime Minister, and Chief Justice of India (this was later reviewed to include Governors and Chief Ministers). It also proposed setting up an ombudsman to oversee government advertising.

Part 10: Conclusion

The journey of India’s electoral democracy is a story of remarkable resilience and continuous evolution. Grounded in a robust constitutional framework and meticulously detailed by the Representation of the People Acts, the system has successfully managed the world’s largest democratic exercise for decades, with the Election Commission of India serving as its vigilant guardian. The regular and peaceful transfer of power stands as a testament to the strength of these foundational pillars.

However, this robust framework is perpetually challenged by persistent and evolving threats. The “twin cancers” of the criminalization of politics and the pervasive influence of money power continue to undermine the principles of a free and fair election. They distort the level playing field, erode public trust, and threaten to make political office a product of wealth and muscle rather than merit and public service. While numerous committees and judicial interventions have diagnosed these maladies and prescribed remedies, their complete eradication remains an unfinished agenda.

As India navigates the complexities of the 21st century, it faces new dilemmas. The rise of social media has introduced unprecedented challenges of misinformation and hate speech, while debates over electoral bonds, simultaneous polls, and technological integration like Aadhaar-linking test the delicate balance between transparency, efficiency, and individual rights.

Ultimately, the future of India’s electoral integrity rests on a continuous commitment to reform. This involves not only strengthening the independence and powers of the Election Commission but also fostering a political culture that rejects criminality and embraces transparency. The path forward requires decisive legislative action, unwavering judicial oversight, and most importantly, an alert and informed electorate that serves as the final arbiter of its democratic destiny.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *